Skip to main content
  • Paul Scherrer Institut PSI
  • PSI Research, Labs & User Services

Digital User Office

  • Digital User Office
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI)
Search
Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI)

Hauptnavigation

  • Research at PSIOpen mainmenu item
    • Research Initiatives
    • Ethics and Research integrity
    • Scientific Highlights
    • Scientific Events
    • Scientific Career
    • PSI-FELLOW
    • PSI Data Policy
  • Research Divisions and LabsOpen mainmenu item
    • Overview
    • Research with Neutrons and Muons
    • Photon Science
    • Energy and Environment
    • Nuclear Energy and Safety
    • Biology and Chemistry
    • Scientific Computing, Theory and Data
    • Large Research Facilities
  • Facilities and InstrumentsOpen mainmenu item
    • Overview
    • Large Research Facilities
    • Facilities
    • PSI Facility Newsletter
  • PSI User ServicesOpen mainmenu item
    • User Office
    • Methods at the PSI User Facilities
    • Proposals for beam time
    • Proposal Deadlines
    • Data Analysis Service (PSD)
    • EU support programmes
  • New ProjectsOpen mainmenu item
    • SLS 2.0
    • IMPACT
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR

Digital User Office (mobile)

  • Digital User Office

You are here:

  1. PSI Home
  2. Labs & User Services
  3. NES
  4. LEA
  5. Technology Assessment
  6. Methods
  7. Decision Support
  8. Interacting criteria

Secondary navigation

Technology Assessment

  • Research Areas
    • Life Cycle Assessment
    • Environmental Impacts Assessment
    • Internal Cost Analysis
    • Risk Assessment
    • Mobility
    • Decision Support
  • Methods Expanded submenu item
    • Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
      • Global Sensitivity Analysis in LCA
      • Prospective LCA
    • Environmental Impact and External Cost Assessment
    • Risk Assessment
      • Accident Risk Assessment
      • Bayesian Approaches
      • Risk Assessment for Critical Infrastructures
    • Decision Support Expanded submenu item
      • Composite Indicators
      • Interacting criteria
      • spatial MCDA
  • People
    • Former Group Members
  • Projects
    • Closed Projects
  • Publications
    • Preprint Journal Articles
    • Journals and Books
    • Reports and Working Papers
  • Theses and Internships
  • Conference
  • Tools
  • News & Scientific Highlights

Interacting criteria

According to the theoretical foundations of Decision Theory and Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), the evaluation criteria that frame a decision problem must be independent and non-redundant to each other.  However, this is unavoidable in many modelling instances and the decision problems can be characterized by complex criteria dependences, which can hamper the development of an efficient and technically sound decision model. In these cases, the dependences, called criteria interactions, are addressed with various methodological frameworks that usually require for their quantification specific preference statements by the decision maker (Bottero et al. 2018).

The different kinds of criteria interactions that have been identified in the literature include mutual strengthening, mutual weakening and antagonistic relationships, for the case of pairs, triplets or more complex groupings of criteria.Several intricate decision problems, such as the evaluation of electricity supply sustainability and resilience or the assessment of risk in energy investments and climate policy making, include such interacting criteria, which, without the appropriate modelling processing and treatment, can endanger the validity of the model and its results.

The modern practical challenge in the MCDA scientific community lies in the facilitation of decision making in a real context, and the construction of accurate and robust models, when interactive criteria exist. Recent work in this direction has been advanced by (Siskos and Burgherr, 2021 and Angilella et al. 2018 among others). In these cases, criteria interactions are mostly approached:

  1. with the elimination of criteria overlaps and synergistic effects, right at the modelling stage. This is performed by searching for more consistent and cleaner data and indicators or by merging interacting dimensions to reduce the possible side effects in the application of a multi-criteria method
  2. with the application of MCDA methods, such as the Choquet integral, which account and address criteria interactions but require additional and often more demanding preference input by the decision maker.

References

Angilella, S., Catalfo, P., Corrente, S., Giarlotta, A., Greco, S., Rizzo, M. (2018), Robust sustainable development assessment with composite indices aggregating interacting dimensions: The hierarchical-SMAA-Choquet integral approach, Knowledge-Based Systems, 158, pp. 136-153.

Bottero, M., Ferretti, V., Figueira, J.R., Greco, S., Roy, B. (2018). On the Choquet multiple criteria preference aggregation model: Theoretical and practical insights from a real-world application, European Journal of Operational Research, 271(1), pp. 120-140.

Siskos, E., Burgherr, P. (2021), Multicriteria decision support for the evaluation of electricity supply resilience: Exploration of interacting criteria, European Journal of Operational Research, under review.

Sidebar

Contact Persons

Dr. Peter Burgherr
Telehone: +41 56 310 2649
E-mail: peter.burgherr@psi.ch

Dr. Eleftherios Siskos
Telephone: +41 56 310 50 19
E-mail: eleftherios.siskos@psi.ch

 

top

Footer

Paul Scherrer Institut

Forschungsstrasse 111
5232 Villigen PSI
Switzerland

Telephone: +41 56 310 21 11
Telefax: +41 56 310 21 99

How to find us
Contact

Visitor Centre psi forum
School Lab iLab (in German)
Center for Proton Therapy
PSI Education Centre
PSI Guest House
PSI Gastronomie (in German)
psi forum shop

Service & Support

  • Phone Book
  • User Office
  • Accelerator Status
  • PSI Publications
  • Suppliers
  • E-Billing
  • Computing
  • Safety (in German)

Career

  • Working at PSI
  • Job Opportunities
  • Training and further education
  • Career Center
  • Vocational Training (in German)
  • PSI Education Center

For the media

  • PSI in brief
  • Facts and Figures
  • Media corner
  • Media Releases
  • Social Media

Follow us: Twitter (in English) LinkedIn Youtube Facebook Instagram Issuu RSS

Footer legal

  • Imprint
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Editors' login