Dark Matter Search

The nEDM apparatus at PSI  is also an excellent tool to search for signatures of dark matter particles (Roccia S, Zsigmond G, 2021). A potential signal is a shift in the ratio of the spin-precession frequencies of ultracold neutrons (UCN) and the 199Hg atoms of the co-magnetometer. This shift can be interpreted as caused by a possible short-range spin-dependent neutron–nucleon interaction mediated by axion-like particles and was studied with high precision (Figure 1, Afach et al. 2015). In a second effort, the aforementioned ratios measured during the nEDM data-taking were analyzed as an axion-induced oscillating electric dipole moment of the neutron, and as an axion-wind spin-precession effect (Figures 2 and 3, Abel et al. 2017).

So-called disappearance experiments, which can also be conducted with UCNs, are a further way to search for dark matter signatures. It was hypothesized in the fifties by Lee and Young  that there could be a mirror copy of the weakly interacting particles, restoring parity conservation on the global level. Since then, various theorists put forward the idea that oscillations between a neutral SM particle, such as the neutron, and its mirror counterpart could help to explain various issues in physics, including dark matter.  Various searches for oscillations of neutrons to mirror-neutrons were conducted using the nEDM apparatus. Limits were achieved for the cases of zero mirror-magnetic field (Ban et al. 2007)  and of assuming non-zero mirror magnetic fields (Altarev et al. 2009) originating from mirror photons. Recent reports of anomalous signals sparked world-wide attention and initiated further search at PSI yielding new limits (Figure 4, Abel et al. 2020). A new dedicated apparatus has been installed at beamport West-1 to continue this effort, see Figure 5. and Ref. N. J. Ayres et al. 2022, with final results published in N. J. Ayres et al. 2026, PRL (Figure 6.) and N. J. Ayres et al. 2026, PRD (Figure 7.). 
 

Figure 1: Limit established at PSI for the scalar-pseudoscalar coupling for axion or axion-like particle (pink solid line) (Afach et al 2015).

Figure 2: First laboratory-based limit on the axion-gluon coupling (Abel et al. 2017).

Figure 3: Limit on the axion-nucleon coupling (Abel et al. 2017).

Figure 4: Lower 95% C.L. limit on the n-n' oscillation time for non-zero mirror magnetic fields (orange line) obtained at PSI (Abel et al. 2020), and the bands represent previously claimed signals.

Figure 5: A new apparatus was recently installed at the West-1 beamport dedicated to the search of neutron to mirror-neutron oscillations at PSI. The UCN storage volume is placed inside the vacuum chamber that is visible in the center. This is surrounded by a Helmholtz-like coil system for an advanced control of the magnetic field stability and its homogeneity.
Figure 6.: The anomalous signal regions of Berezhiani-2018 from data in ( 3⁢𝜎 , red), ( 5.2⁢𝜎 , blue), and ( 2.5⁢𝜎, green) together with the 95% CL limits on 𝜏𝑛⁢𝑛′/√|cos⁡(𝑏)| from PSI-2009 , PSI-2021 , and this Letter as a function of the magnitude of the mirror magnetic field 𝐵′ . Along with the most conservative PSI-2026 limit (black line) excluding 99.98% of the full solid angle ( 4⁢𝜋 ) defined in the (𝑎,𝑏) parameter space, two higher limit curves but with less solid angle exclusion (99.62% and 89.84%) are plotted, corresponding to levels of factor 2 (dashed line) and 5 (dotted line) above the anomalous signals. (See https://doi.org/10.1103/2qck-n6mb)
Figure 7: Top: Limits at 95% C.L. on τnn′ (linear axis) as a function of the mass splitting δm based on the results of this analysis, “PSI-2026” (purple), along with UCN beam measurements at ILL (Grenoble) (yellow and cyan), and the upper envelope of limits previously obtained from UCN storage measurements at PSI and ILL are shown in red. The astrophysical limit related to neutron star cooling is indicated by the gray shade. Bottom: Extended parameter ranges with additional limits from “regeneration” experiments STEREO (blue), MURMUR (green), SNS (black) and a reinterpretation of UCNτ data. (See https://doi.org/10.1103/3kqg-c7bp)