Aller au contenu principal
  • Paul Scherrer Institut PSI
  • PSI Research, Labs & User Services

Digital User Office

  • Digital User Office
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI)
Rechercher
Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI)

Hauptnavigation

  • Research at PSIOuvrir ce point de menu principal
    • Research Initiatives
    • Ethics and Research integrity
    • Scientific Highlights
    • Scientific Events
    • Scientific Career
    • PSI-FELLOW
    • PSI Data Policy
  • Research Divisions and LabsOuvrir ce point de menu principal
    • Overview
    • Research with Neutrons and Muons
    • Photon Science
    • Energy and Environment
    • Nuclear Energy and Safety
    • Biology and Chemistry
    • Scientific Computing, Theory and Data
    • Large Research Facilities
    • Logistics
  • Facilities and InstrumentsOuvrir ce point de menu principal
    • Overview
    • Large Research Facilities
    • Facilities
    • PSI Facility Newsletter
  • PSI User ServicesOuvrir ce point de menu principal
    • User Office
    • Methods at the PSI User Facilities
    • Proposals for beam time
    • Proposal Deadlines
    • Data Analysis Service (PSD)
    • EU support programmes
  • New ProjectsOuvrir ce point de menu principal
    • SLS 2.0
    • IMPACT
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR

Digital User Office (mobile)

  • Digital User Office

Vous êtes ici:

  1. PSI Home
  2. Labs & User Services
  3. NES
  4. LEA
  5. Technology Assessment
  6. Research Areas
  7. Decision Support

Navigation secondaire

Technology Assessment

  • Research Areas Sous-menu élargi
    • Life Cycle Assessment
    • Environmental Impacts Assessment
    • Internal Cost Analysis
    • Risk Assessment
    • Mobility
    • Decision Support
  • Methods
    • Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
      • Global Sensitivity Analysis in LCA
      • Prospective LCA
    • Environmental Impact and External Cost Assessment
    • Risk Assessment
      • Accident Risk Assessment
      • Bayesian Approaches
      • Risk Assessment for Critical Infrastructures
    • Decision Support
      • Composite Indicators
      • Interacting criteria
      • spatial MCDA
  • People
    • Former Group Members
  • Projects
    • Closed Projects
  • Publications
    • Preprint Journal Articles
    • Journals and Books
    • Reports and Working Papers
  • Theses and Internships
  • Conference
  • Tools
  • News & Scientific Highlights

Info message

Ce contenu n'est pas disponible en français.

Decision Support

In the context of decision support, the Technology Assessment (TA) group makes use of two aggregation approaches in order to consider all possible criteria (e.g., environmental, economic and social for sustainability assessment). The two approaches are the estimation of total costs (TC) and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA).

Total costs represent the sum of the internal (or production) and external costs both for individual energy technologies (i.e., electricity, heating and cooling, mobility) and at the scenario level. They are sometimes also used as a measure of sustainability, although this is controversial because the social dimension is only partially taken into account. Costs are called “external” if they are not born by the party that causes them, but rather by society as a whole, i.e., the costs of health damages that result from air pollution, the costs of accidents, etc. External costs are monetized, or valued in monetary units, using several methods, including damage costs, avoidance costs (e.g., to reduce emissions), or people’s willingness to pay. Total costs cannot be considered objective as valuations are uncertain, stakeholders do not generally agree on them, and there is no actual market where values are established and paid. Some aspects of social acceptance such as perceived risks or visual amenity are strongly subjective and may be very difficult to monetize. Therefore, non-monetized factors are not considered in the final total cost estimates.

On the other hand, MCDA has the capability to explicitly reflect subjective social acceptance issues. Generally, it compares selected alternatives based on a given set of criteria and indicators using preferences elicited from different stakeholders. In contrast to the total cost approach, MCDA does not just produce a single ranking of alternatives (e.g., technologies, scenarios), but rather is suitable for different problem typologies (e.g., ranking, sorting, choice) and aims to address conflicting objectives and to systematically explore potential trade-offs and co-benefits to identify robust and widely accepted solutions. The MCDA process can be divided in several distinct steps. First, the alternatives to be compared must be defined. Second, indicators are established for the criteria of interest (e.g., environmental, economic and social). Third, indicators need to be established for all alternatives. Fourth, depending on the problem of interest, a suitable MCDA method must be selected (e.g., for ranking, sorting, etc.). Fifth, stakeholder preferences are elicited, for example how much importance is assigned to each individual indicator in a weighting scheme. Finally, based on the selected MCDA method the final outcome is given in terms of scoring, ranking, class of preference, etc., which is then used to support the decision-making process.  Stakeholder or decisionmaker inputs and/or feedback are preferably solicited at each step of this process (not just preference elicitation) to build confidence and acceptance of the MCDA results.  MCDA does not provide a single, definitive ranking or scoring of alternatives, but rather illustrates the sensitivity of the ranking to the subjective preferences provided by the various individual or group stakeholders. Often presentation of the MCDA results can result in iterative adjustment of stakeholder preferences. Overall, the MCDA approach enables one to account for a wide variety of aspects in a transparent and consistent manner. It can provide an invaluable support to informed decision-making, and in guiding public debate and participative processes.

 

Sidebar

Contact Persons

Dr. Peter Burgherr
Telehone: +41 56 310 2649
E-mail: peter.burgherr@psi.ch

Dr. Matteo Spada
Telephone: +41 56 310 5690
E-mail: matteo.spada@psi.ch
 

top

Pied de page

Paul Scherrer Institut

Forschungsstrasse 111
5232 Villigen PSI
Suisse

Téléphone: +41 56 310 21 11
Téléfax: +41 56 310 21 99

Comment nous trouver 
Contact

Centre de visiteurs psi forum
Laboratoire élèves iLab (en allemand)
Centre de protonthérapie
Centre de Formation du PSI
PSI Guest House (en anglais)
PSI Gastronomie (en allemand)
psi forum shop

Service & Support

  • Annuaire
  • User Office
  • Accelerator Status
  • Publications du PSI
  • Fournisseurs
  • E-facture
  • Computing (en anglais)
  • Sicherheit (en allemand)

Carrière

  • Travailler au PSI
  • Offres d'emploi
  • Formation initiale et formation continue
  • Career Center
  • Formation professionnelle (en allemand)
  • Centre de Formation du PSI

Pour les médias

  • Le PSI en bref
  • Chiffres et faits
  • Le coin médias
  • Communiqués de presse
  • Réseaux sociaux

Suivez le PSI: Twitter (in English) LinkedIn Youtube Facebook Instagram Issuu RSS

Footer legal

  • Impressum
  • Conditions d'utilisation / Protection des données
  • Login éditeurs